A Phased-In Model for Canadian Universal Basic Income:
Macroeconomic Engineering, Revenue Neutrality, and Administrative Modernization
1. Executive Summary and Economic Context
Wealth and income concentration across Western
industrialized economies has reached historical highs. In North America, the
top 1% of households controls between 32% and 35% of all national wealth, while
Western European economies concentrate roughly 25% within the top percentile
(Chancel et al., 2022). At the global level, personal wealth held by the
wealthiest 1% stands at approximately 37%, leaving the remaining 99% to share
63% (Chancel et al., 2022).
Simultaneously, aggregate production measured by Gross
Domestic Product (GDP) per capita sits near $85,000 in the United States and
between $55,000 and $65,000 across Canada and peer Western European nations
(Hoynes & Rothstein, 2019). This divergence illustrates that while national
output is substantial, median household disposable income fails to reflect
broad gains in productivity and automation.
Establishing an economic floor—a Universal Basic Income
(UBI)—is frequently criticized as either cost-prohibitive or prone to runaway
demand-pull inflation. However, conventional critiques routinely conflate gross
accounting expenditures with net structural costs. When evaluated against gross
domestic product, ending extreme poverty requires transferring less than 3% of
aggregate national income (Georgetown University, 2018).
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
STRUCTURAL WEALTH DISPARITY |
|
|
| Top 1%
Holdings: 32% - 35% of Total
Wealth (North America) |
| Remaining 99%: 65% - 68% of Total Wealth |
|
|
| Aggregate
Production: $55,000 - $65,000 CAD GDP
per capita |
| Net Poverty-Line
UBI: Less than 3% of National GDP to
achieve |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
The model presented here establishes a phased, predictable
UBI for Canada. By moving from a $122.20 per month starting baseline to a
terminal floor of $2,000 per month over 20 quarters (5 years), the rollout
bypasses immediate demand shocks, aligns consumer purchasing power with
physical production capacity, and maintains net balance sheet revenue
neutrality through an automated recovery surtax built into the Canada Revenue
Agency (CRA) tax grid (Trower, 2024).
2. Monetary Architecture and Phased Implementation
Mechanics
Decoupling Liquidity from Illiquid Asset Seizure
Traditional public policy assumes that before a dollar is
deployed into social programs, an equivalent dollar must first be collected via
corporate taxes, sales taxes, or bond issuance. This conceptual framework
treats money as a finite, physical hoard rather than a sovereign ledger
balance. In modern fiat monetary regimes, liquidity is created directly by
central banks through digital account crediting (Fullwiler et al., 2012).
A basic income floor does not require seizing or liquidating
private, illiquid wealth—such as commercial real estate, corporate equipment,
or proprietary technological software (Hoynes & Rothstein, 2019).
Liquidating capital goods breaks down the productive apparatus that generates
GDP. Instead, a fiat-funded mechanism treats monetary injection as an
engineered protocol: the central bank issues virtual liquidity directly to
individuals, while the taxation framework acts after the fact to mop up excess
circulating currency, balance aggregate demand, and curb runaway asset
accumulation (Fullwiler et al., 2012; Trower, 2024).
The Inflation Risk of Unmitigated Demand Shocks
Direct, sudden cash injections fail when currency
distribution outpaces the physical capacity of farms, housing markets, energy
grids, and distribution logistics to provide goods. In an Overlapping
Generations (OLG) dynamic general equilibrium model calibrated to high-income
economies, an instantaneous cash drop of $1,000 per month caused sharp initial
labor supply dislocations and required aggressive consumption taxes to maintain
budget equilibrium, leading to immediate welfare loss (Kharun, 2024).
Similarly, Milton Friedman's Quantity Theory of Money shows
that channeling high-velocity liquidity into low-income households creates an
immediate surge in consumer demand (Duarte et al., 2024). When that surge
arrives as an unannounced shock, consumer markets adjust upward by raising
prices, triggering immediate demand-pull inflation that erodes the real
purchasing power of the baseline benefit.
The 15% Quarterly Compounding Solution
To resolve this issue, the roll-out uses a gradual,
predictable ramp-up schedule: an initial baseline payment of $122.20 per month
that increases by 15% compounded every quarter over a 5-year timeline (20 total
quarters), reaching $2,000.00 per month by Quarter 21 (Trower, 2024).
Monthly Payout ($
CAD)
$2,000
+-----------------------------------------------------------+ [Q21: $2,000.00]
|
* * *|
$1,500 | * * * |
| * *
* |
$1,000 | * * * |
| * * * |
$500 | * * * * * |
| * * * * * * |
$0
+-*--*--*---------------------------------------------------+
Q1 Q3
Q5 Q7 Q9
Q11 Q13 Q15
Q17 Q19 Q21
Time (Quarters)
This schedule produces three operational stabilization
phases:
- Phase
1 (Quarters 1–4: $122.20 to $185.85/month): In Year 1, the total net
liquidity injected represents approximately 2.1% of national GDP. This
volume fits comfortably within ordinary monetary fluctuations. It creates
zero incentive for retailers to alter structural pricing, yet provides
vulnerable households immediate cash relief for nutrition, transit, and
household utilities.
- Phase
2 (Quarters 5–16: $213.73 to $994.35/month): Over Years 2 through 4,
the quarterly compounding trajectory delivers an unambiguous, completely
visible demand signal to the private sector. Retailers, manufacturers, and
service industries observe a steady, compounding upward trend in local
purchasing volume. Because the expansion is gradual and transparent,
businesses can invest capital into automated processing, expanded retail
lines, and inventory efficiency to meet demand. Supply grows
systematically alongside the expanding baseline.
- Phase
3 (Quarters 17–20: $1,143.50 to $1,739.12/month; entering $2,000/month by
Year 6): The permanent baseline floor stabilizes at $24,000 annually
per adult citizen. By Year 6, production, distribution chains, and
automated infrastructure have had 60 months of compounding lead time to
adapt, protecting consumer purchasing power from structural inflation.
3. Five-Year National Budgetary Ledger: Canada Case Study
The ledger below maps the 5-year compounding schedule across
Canada’s adult population over age 17 (approximately 32 million citizens out of
an overall population of 41 million; Statistics Canada, 2024).
The table details:
- Monthly
payment levels across each quarter.
- Total
annual transfer received by an individual Canadian citizen.
- Gross
Outlay: The total cash disbursed by the central banking ledger.
- Net
Outlay: The true fiscal cost after the top 20% highest-income quintile
has their basic income reabsorbed through automated progressive year-end
tax adjustments.
Table 1: Five-Year Phased UBI Schedule for Canada (CAD)
|
Year
|
Q1 Monthly
|
Q2 Monthly
|
Q3 Monthly
|
Q4 Monthly
|
Total Annual / Person
|
Gross National Outlay (32M Adults)
|
True Net Cost (Bottom 80%)
|
|
Year 1
|
$122.20
|
$140.53
|
$161.61
|
$185.85
|
$1,830.57
|
$58.58 Billion
|
$46.86 Billion
|
|
Year 2
|
$213.73
|
$245.79
|
$282.66
|
$325.05
|
$3,201.69
|
$102.45 Billion
|
$81.96 Billion
|
|
Year 3
|
$373.81
|
$429.88
|
$494.37
|
$568.52
|
$5,599.74
|
$179.19 Billion
|
$143.35 Billion
|
|
Year 4
|
$653.80
|
$751.87
|
$864.65
|
$994.35
|
$9,794.01
|
$313.41 Billion
|
$250.73 Billion
|
|
Year 5
|
$1,143.50
|
$1,315.03
|
$1,512.28
|
$1,739.12
|
$17,129.79
|
$548.15 Billion
|
$438.52 Billion
|
|
Year 6+
|
$2,000.00
|
$2,000.00
|
$2,000.00
|
$2,000.00
|
$24,000.00
|
$768.00 Billion
|
$614.40 Billion
|
Note: Compounding follows 
. By Quarter 21 (Q1 of Year
6), monthly transfers hit the terminal baseline of $2,000.00 per month ($24,000
annualized).
4. Back-End Revenue Neutrality: The UBI Recovery Surtax
Eliminating the "Welfare Trap" and
Means-Testing Overhead
Targeted programs, such as traditional social assistance or
proposed Guaranteed Livable Basic Income (GLBI) models, rely on upfront
means-testing. If an individual earns money through employment, the program
claws back their benefit at steep rates (often 50% or more), creating a
punitive marginal tax rate known as the "welfare trap" (Forget, 2011;
UBI Works, 2024a). Furthermore, means-testing requires policing assets,
tracking personal choices, and screening applicant eligibility, wasting substantial
public funds on administrative management (Trower, 2024).
Under a universal framework, cash disbursements are
distributed universally and unconditionally to every adult citizen without
prior screening. The balance sheet is leveled after the fact on annual tax
filings via the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) using Line 23400 net income
calculations—the same mechanism Canada already uses to reclaim Old Age Security
(OAS) benefits from high-income retirees (Canada Revenue Agency, 2024).
The Clawback Schedule
The UBI is treated as ordinary taxable income subject to a
targeted UBI Recovery Surtax. This tax leaves the bottom 40% completely
untouched, applies a light taper through the middle class to avoid work
disincentives, and hits a break-even threshold where top earners fully return
the benefit.
Net Annual
Benefit ($ CAD)
+$24k
+------------------------\
| \
+$15k | \
| \
+$5k | \
$0
+-----------------------------\*---------------------------
| ^ Break-Even:
$143,785
-$5k
+----------------------------------------------------------
$0k $50k $100k $150k $200k
$250k
Taxable
Income ($ CAD)
Table 2: The Progressive UBI Recovery Scale (Unadjusted
Baseline)
|
Federal Tax Bracket
|
Base Federal Tax Rate
|
Programmatic UBI Recovery Surtax
|
Total Effective Marginal Rate
|
Net Retained UBI (At $24,000 Baseline)
|
Fiscal Role of Tier
|
|
$0 to $58,523
|
14.0%
|
0.0%
|
14.0%
|
+$24,000
|
Full net beneficiary; drives bottom-up economic spending.
|
|
$58,523 to $117,045
|
20.5%
|
10.0%
|
30.5%
|
+$18,148
|
Soft phase-out; maintains work and promotional incentives.
|
|
$117,045 to $181,440
|
26.0%
|
20.0%
|
46.0%
|
+$5,269
|
Near break-even corridor.
|
|
$143,785 Threshold
|
26.0%
|
20.0%
|
46.0%
|
$0
|
Exact Break-Even Point (Net UBI equals $0).
|
|
$181,440 to $258,482
|
29.0%
|
100% Surtax
|
29.0%
|
$0
|
Full clawback (Line 23400); zero administrative overhead.
|
|
Over $258,482
|
33.0%
|
100% Surtax
|
33.0%
|
$0
|
Full clawback; anchors long-term currency balance.
|
Note: Calculations reflect federal tax brackets established
under Canadian fiscal guidelines (Canada Revenue Agency, 2024).
At $143,785 of net income, an individual's recovery surtax
equals the full $24,000 annual disbursement ($5,852.20 clawed back from the
$58,523–$117,045 tier, plus $18,147.80 clawed back from the remaining income
above $117,045). Anyone earning less than $143,785 remains a net beneficiary;
anyone earning more sees their transfer fully recovered on their annual tax
return (Canada Revenue Agency, 2024; Statistics Canada, 2024).
5. Structuring Realized Administrative and Operational
Savings
Isolating What Legitimately Disappears
Proposals that assume 100% of social service expenditures
can be zeroed out to fund cash dividends are unrealistic. Specialized public
infrastructure—such as residential care, addictions support caseworkers,
physical shelters, and child protection services—cannot be replaced with a cash
transfer. These core services must stay in place.
However, a universal cash floor eliminates the need for the
extensive Eligibility Verification and Compliance Apparatus. In
provincial programs like Ontario Works, the Ontario Disability Support Program
(ODSP), and provincial equivalents across British Columbia and Quebec,
substantial resources are spent solely on policing poverty:
- Reviewing
bank statements to uncover unreported supplemental work.
- Conducting
recurring medical evaluations to re-verify permanent conditions.
- Processing
complex micro-subsidies for municipal transit and basic drug cards.
- Operating
legal appeal boards and administrative tribunals for terminated
recipients.
Under an unconditional basic income handled through the CRA
tax grid, this surveillance infrastructure becomes obsolete.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
LEGITIMATE STRUCTURAL SAVINGS RECOVERY |
|
|
| Elimination of
Provincial Compliance/Policing: $6B to $8B / year |
| Absorption of Core
Provincial Social Assistance Cash:
$32B / year |
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Direct Baseline
Administrative Windfall:
$38B / year |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Optimizing the Working-Class Tax Grid
Transferring the baseline income security portfolio to the
federal ledger frees up $38 billion in provincial spending. Applying this $38
billion directly to offset the UBI Recovery Surtax reduces the clawback rates
applied to middle-income earners:
Table 3: Middle-Class Clawback Optimization from
Administrative Savings
|
Income Bracket
|
Baseline Surtax
|
Optimized Surtax
|
Net Retained UBI (Optimized)
|
Economic Impact
|
|
$0 to $58,523
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
+$24,000
|
Unaltered; protects low-income households.
|
|
$58,523 to $117,045
|
10.0%
|
6.0%
|
+$20,488
|
Retains an extra $2,340 compared to baseline model.
|
|
$117,045 to $181,440
|
20.0%
|
14.0%
|
+$11,392
|
Retains an extra $6,123 compared to baseline model.
|
|
Break-Even Point
|
$143,785
|
$176,210
|
$0 Net Point
|
Moves the break-even threshold up into the 88th
percentile.
|
By applying administrative savings directly to the tax
schedule, the break-even mark rises to $176,210, extending positive net returns
to nearly 88% of working Canadians. Meanwhile, the modest 6% recovery rate in
the second bracket ensures that middle earners keep 94 cents of every extra
dollar earned, preserving strong incentives for professional advancement.
6. Secondary Downstream Savings: Public Health and
Criminal Justice
Secondary savings in healthcare and criminal justice should
not be treated as immediate upfront cash to fund initial dividend checks.
Hospital buildings, prison infrastructure, judicial salaries, and equipment
represent fixed public expenditures that do not disappear automatically when
admissions drop.
Instead, verified reductions in system strain serve as an economic
buffer that curbs the long-term expenditure trajectory of provincial public
services.
Hospitalization Rates: The 8.5% Factor
During the Mincome guaranteed basic income experiment in
Dauphin, Manitoba, Dr. Evelyn Forget cross-referenced participant data with the
provincial Medicare billing database (Forget, 2011). The research documented an
8.5% decline in hospital admissions among participants compared to the
control group.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
MINCOME HEALTH TRIAL FINDINGS |
| |
| Hospitalization
Decline: 8.5% overall drop in patient
admissions |
| Primary
Drivers: Accident/injury
billing and acute mental health |
|
diagnoses dropped significantly |
|
|
| Canadian Hospital
Sector: ~$85 Billion per year |
| Potential Hospital
Relief: ~$7.2 Billion annually in deferred utilization |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
The reduction was concentrated in two areas:
- Accidents
and Injuries: Relieving acute financial desperation led to fewer
alcohol-related motor vehicle accidents, safer working paces during
agricultural harvests, and less pressure to remain in unsafe physical job
settings (Forget, 2011).
- Mental
Health Disorders: Unconditional income security reduced household
domestic stress, leading to fewer acute psychiatric interventions and
mental health emergency room visits (Forget, 2011).
Similar results emerged during the 2017 Ontario Basic Income
Pilot: 83% of participating low-income recipients reported marked reductions in
chronic psychological stress and anxiety, reducing emergency room visits (Basic
Income Canada Network, 2019).
Across Canada, hospital expenditures total roughly $85
billion out of $340 billion in overall public healthcare spending (Canadian
Institute for Health Information, 2023). An 8.5% decline in acute
hospitalization demand represents approximately $7.2 billion per year in
deferred acute care costs, emergency room relief, and avoided capital
expansions.
Criminal Justice and Incarceration Strain
Research evaluating town-level policing records during
Canadian income maintenance pilots demonstrated a clear negative relationship
between guaranteed basic income floors and property crime rates (Forget, 2011;
Calnitsky & Gorski, 2016). When an individual's basic survival needs—food,
heating, shelter—are guaranteed, low-level property theft, shoplifting under
$5,000, and survival infractions decline significantly.
In Canada, keeping an individual in a federal correctional
facility costs taxpayers between $125,000 and $250,000 per inmate each year
(Office of the Correctional Investigator, 2023). Because a high proportion of
incarcerated individuals—including up to 80% of incarcerated women—are held for
offenses tied directly to poverty, trauma, and financial marginalization (Pate,
2020), introducing a guaranteed baseline floor substantially cuts down arrests,
judicial hearing loads, and long-term correctional corrections budgets.
7. Mathematical Proofs and Literature Review
Academic research demonstrates that fiat-based basic income
policies are supported by empirical modeling and theoretical proof:
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
MACROECONOMIC ACADEMIC CONSENSUS |
|
|
| 1. Stable
Equilibrium: Self-funding protocols
maintain invariant balance |
| using automated
liquidity absorption rules. |
|
|
| 2. Phasing
Necessity: Dynamic OLG models prove
unphased cash drops |
| create welfare
losses through supply shocks. |
|
|
| 3. Dynamic
Velocity: Cash channeled to
high-velocity quintiles drives |
| reversed Cantillon productivity
increases. |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- Closed-Loop
Balance Proofs: Macroeconomic analysis proves that an independent
currency system with an integrated, rule-based basic income can maintain a
stable monetary equilibrium outside of traditional debt issuance. By
modeling individual claims coupled with automated liquidity absorption
(such as transaction burns or tax clawbacks), nominal revenue remains
invariant to currency velocity. In a 10,000-draw Monte Carlo simulation
testing systemic economic shocks, this configuration achieved a 69.7%
feasibility rating across broad macroeconomic stress criteria and a 98.4%
revenue-adequacy rate (Kharun, 2024).
- The
Transition Necessity in Dynamic OLG Frameworks: Dynamic overlapping
generations (OLG) models calibrated to modern economies illustrate why
unphased rollouts struggle (Kharun, 2024). Immediate, unannounced drops of
$1,000 per month distort short-term labor-leisure decisions and
necessitate steep, disruptive consumption taxes to avoid fiscal gaps. A
phased, compounded ramp-up solves this friction by providing a reliable
adjustment window for household labor choices and business capital
allocation.
- The
Reversed Cantillon Effect: Analyzing basic income using Milton
Friedman’s Quantity Theory of Money highlights how injection mechanics
shape market outcomes (Duarte et al., 2024). Traditional central bank
quantitative easing directs liquidity through financial institutions,
inflating equity markets and high-end real estate without expanding
middle-class consumption—the standard Cantillon effect. By contrast,
distributing baseline liquidity directly to the lower and middle income
brackets triggers a "reversed Cantillon effect." The new
liquidity moves quickly through local businesses, giving supply chains an
unmistakable demand signal to invest in productivity and efficiency
upgrades. Under structured monetary constraints, this productive expansion
keeps the system stable and non-inflationary over the long term (Duarte et
al., 2024; Hoynes & Rothstein, 2019).
8. Strategic Proposal and Policy Recommendations
To implement this model effectively, policymakers should
proceed through a structured four-stage plan:
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP |
|
|
| Stage 1:
Federal-Provincial Accord & Statutory Groundwork |
| Establish the $38B compliance absorption
agreement and ratify the |
| CRA Line
23400 UBI Recovery Surtax schedule. |
|
|
| Stage 2: Deployment
of Phased Liquidity (Years 1 to 2) |
| Launch
initial $122.20/month distribution; scale at 15% quarterly; |
| monitor
CPI, velocity trends, and local supply chain reactions. |
| |
| Stage 3: Full-Scale
Industrial Alignment (Years 3 to 5) |
|
Compounding continues from $373.81 to $1,739.12/month; businesses |
| deploy
capital upgrades to match expanding purchasing volume. |
|
|
| Stage 4:
Steady-State Transition & System Modernization (Year 6+) |
| Achieve
the terminal $2,000/month ($24,000/year) baseline; retire |
| legacy
compliance offices; capture public health and safety gains. |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- Stage
1: Federal-Provincial Administrative Realignment (Preparation):
- Draft
a joint Federal-Provincial Accord to fold basic social assistance
payments into the national program, capturing the $38 billion in
administrative and baseline transfer costs.
- Formalize
the recovery surtax scale within the Canada Revenue Agency framework,
using Line 23400 income reporting to handle progressive year-end
adjustments without means-testing.
- Stage
2: Launch of Phased Liquidity Schedule (Years 1–2):
- Roll
out the initial $122.20 per month cash floor to all adult citizens using
central bank direct deposits, advancing the payout by 15% every quarter.
- Direct
the Bank of Canada and Statistics Canada to track quarterly currency
velocity, capacity utilization, and consumer price indices. If supply
chains experience unexpected friction, the quarterly adjustment rate can
be temporarily paused until capacity balances out.
- Stage
3: Supply-Side Industrial Adaptation (Years 3–5):
- Advance
quarterly compounding from $373.81 up to $1,739.12 per month.
- Allow
private sector suppliers to take advantage of the predictable demand
ramp-up by investing in logistical networks, automation, and domestic
workforce development.
- Stage
4: Institutional Transition (Year 6 and Beyond):
- Transition
into the steady-state baseline floor of $2,000.00 per month ($24,000
annually per adult citizen).
- Shutter
redundant provincial compliance and tribunal offices while reallocating
specialized caseworkers directly to acute healthcare, disability
navigation, and addiction rehabilitation networks.
- Direct
the realized operational savings in hospitals ($7.2B/year) and
correctional facilities into ongoing deficit reduction and long-term
national productivity investments.
References
Basic Income Canada Network. (2019). Signposts to success:
Report on the Ontario basic income pilot. Basic Income Canada Network. https://basicincomecanada.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Signposts-to-Success_BICN_2019.pdf
Calnitsky, D., & Gorski, P. (2016). The impact of an
experimental guaranteed income on crime: Evidence from the Manitoba Basic
Annual Income Experiment (Mincome). ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305218765_The_Impact_of_an_Experimental_Guaranteed_Income_on_Crime
Canada Revenue Agency. (2024). Line 23400 – Net income: Old
Age Security clawback threshold and recovery tax. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/tax/individuals/topics/about-your-tax-return/tax-return/completing-a-tax-return/deductions-credits-expenses/line-23400-net-income.html
Canadian Institute for Health Information. (2023). National
health expenditure trends, 2023. CIHI. https://www.cihi.ca/en/national-health-expenditure-trends
Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2022).
World inequality report 2022. World Inequality Lab. https://wir2022.wid.world/
Duarte, F., Fontaine, I., & Restrepo-Echavarria, P.
(2024). Universal basic income and inflation: Reviewing theory and evidence.
Social Protection.org. https://socialprotection.org/discover/publications/universal-basic-income-and-inflation-reviewing-theory-and-evidence
Forget, E. L. (2011). The town with no poverty: The health
effects of a Canadian guaranteed annual income field experiment. Canadian
Public Policy, 37(3), 283–305. https://www.utpjournals.press/doi/abs/10.3138/cpp.37.3.283
Fullwiler, S. T., Kelton, S. A., & Wray, L. R. (2012).
Modern money theory: A primer on macroeconomics for sovereign monetary systems.
Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2008542
Georgetown University. (2018). Less than 3 percent of GDP
could end U.S. poverty, new research shows. Georgetown University Global
Financial Literacy Excellence Center. https://www.georgetown.edu/news/less-than-3-percent-of-gdp-could-end-u-s-poverty/
Hoynes, H., & Rothstein, J. (2019). Universal basic
income in the United States and advanced countries. Annual Review of Economics,
11, 929–958. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030237
Kharun, A. (2024). The macroeconomic effects of universal
basic income programs. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Working Papers, WP
24-08. https://www.clevelandfed.org/publications/working-paper/2024/wp-2408-macroeconomic-effects-universal-basic-income-programs
Office of the Correctional Investigator. (2023). Annual
report of the Office of the Correctional Investigator 2022-2023. Government of
Canada. https://oci-bec.gc.ca/en/content/office-correctional-investigator-annual-report-2022-2023
Pate, K. (2020). Incarceration, poverty, and human rights in
Canada. Senate of Canada. https://sencanada.ca/en/senators/pate-kim/
Statistics Canada. (2024). Population estimates, quarterly:
Table 17-10-0009-01. Statistics Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1710000901
Trower, B. (2024). GLBI is not UBI: Bill C-223 and the
phased path to genuine economic baseline security. The Deep North. https://blog.bobtrower.com/2024/09/glbi-is-not-ubi-bill-c-223.html
UBI Works. (2024a). How to pay for basic income: Detailed
economic models for Canada. UBI Works. https://www.ubiworks.ca/howtopay
UBI Works. (2024b). Basic income explained: Guaranteed Basic
Income (GBI) vs. Universal Basic Income (UBI). UBI Works. https://www.ubiworks.ca/basic-income-explained
