A Story About Bees

When I was eight years old, the gully across the street was my kingdom. It was a wild, adventurous realm, perfect for an ADHD-fueled boy with a knack for turning curiosity into calamity. My friend and I spent countless hours there, digging, exploring, and occasionally getting into trouble. But one day, the gully fought back—and it fought back hard.

We were deep in our mission, excavating softened, rotted wood at the bottom of the gully. The wood had this odd reddish hue, and whether it was actually redwood or just nature’s way of being weird, I’ll never know. The buzzing of a few bees added an annoying background soundtrack to our adventure, but we were determined to press on.

Then came the obstacle: a skinny little tree, stubbornly planted right in the middle of our excavation site. It was like the universe’s middle finger to our progress. We hacked, we tugged, we argued with it, but it wouldn’t budge. Finally, I took matters into my own hands—or rather, both hands—and grabbed it with all the determination an eight-year-old could muster. I yanked with everything I had.

CRACK!

The tree surrendered… and so did my sense of safety. In an instant, I was covered, head to toe, in wasps. Turns out, I hadn’t just annoyed a tree—I had just evicted an entire wasp colony. The buzzing that had been a minor annoyance was now an angry symphony of winged vengeance.

Adrenaline kicked in, and I bolted. I ran screaming up the steep gully, across the street, and up the stairs to my house, a living blur of flailing limbs and stinging fury. My mom heard the commotion and opened the door, greeted by the unforgettable sight of her son in full wasp attack mode.

She screamed. I screamed. The wasps probably screamed in their own waspy way. It was a chaotic masterpiece.

Without missing a beat, my mother transformed into a combat medic. She herded me into the washroom, clothes flying off as she worked to rid me of the still-clinging attackers. Soon, I was sitting in a bath, covered in red, angry stings, my dignity left somewhere in the gully.

And that, my friends, is how I learned two valuable lessons: 1) never underestimate a skinny tree, and 2) sometimes the gully wins.

Report Your Actual Data

This example underscores a crucial principle in data collection and analysis: report your data as you actually find it, without smoothing or 'fudging.'

The graph shown is a mock-up, but it's based on a real experience. Years ago, my company was contracted to collect, characterize, and analyze customer financial data for a client in the financial services sector. Understanding customer demographics is essential for financial services, especially when identifying where most assets reside. In this case, the financial power was concentrated among baby boomers, with a peak around the birth year of 1955.

When we plotted the collected data, we noticed a sharp spike at 1955 that seemed anomalous. Nevertheless, I adhere to a policy of “playing it as it lies” — reporting findings as they appear, without embellishment. We presented the graph as it was, odd as it looked.

Before finalizing the report, we investigated the anomaly and discovered the cause: data entry staff, when uncertain of a birth year, were instructed to enter '55' in the two-digit year field. By reporting this faithfully, we provided our client with important actionable insights:

1. Their data collection process had gaps, including missing or erroneous entries.
2. By estimating the excess in the spike, we could approximate an error rate.
3. Our honest reporting demonstrated the integrity of our analysis.

For those trained to collect, analyze, and report data correctly, this may seem obvious. However, the practice of reporting raw, unaltered data has declined in recent decades, and, in many cases, raw data is no longer accessible. Reporting faithfully remains essential for transparency and trustworthiness in analysis.

Western Missiles in Russia

NATO on Notice: The Nuclear Threshold

Russia has consistently outlined thresholds for nuclear weapons use, though its rhetoric has softened over the years. Recent events, however, suggest that firing Western-supplied missiles into Russian territory crosses a significant line. This could provoke a nuclear "warning shot," assuming Russia's nuclear arsenal is functional (a possible but unconfirmed variable), or it could lead to a dangerous standoff reminiscent of a high-stakes game of "nuclear chicken."

As I discussed in my September 2024 post (NATO-Russia: Enough Already), the possibility of nuclear weapons being used was not hypothetical—it was a looming threat as tensions escalated. Now, those risks have become even more palpable.

Speculation includes the possibility of Russia detonating a nuclear device over water as a demonstration of resolve without immediate mass casualties. This scenario aligns with their long-standing strategy to maintain nuclear credibility while avoiding full-scale war.

NATO’s strategy of incremental involvement—often termed "creeping commitment"—has culminated in a scenario where Russia faces three bleak options: escalate to nuclear weapons, endure progressive military attrition, or capitulate to a NATO-backed Ukraine. Each choice risks severe consequences.

If Russia resorts to using a nuclear weapon beyond a demonstrative act, it could trigger direct U.S. retaliation, escalating into the nightmare of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). Even a limited exchange risks spiraling into uncontrollable devastation. What would Russia gain from launching a single nuke at the U.S., knowing the response would likely obliterate them? The MAD doctrine suggests both sides are primed to retaliate in a way that leaves no winner.

The situation reflects a failure of diplomacy and leadership. If rational decision-making were truly at the forefront, we would not be approaching this brink. The hope remains that saner heads prevail, but the current trajectory makes that hope increasingly tenuous.

Theory of Evolution Through Natural Selection

The Theory of Evolution Through Natural Selection is an explanatory model that provides explanation and guidance for how the living world is arranged and (nominally) why. It is not a 'belief' as such. It is an explanatory model for which we have much empirical evidence. Most of us have seen the evidence with our own eyes during our lived experience. I find it to be a simple logical construction, but it seems many if not most people find it somehow hard to understand. It is, in essence, a tautology, something which cannot be untrue -- that which survives survives. 

Darwin's theory of evolution through natural selection can be summarized in a simple 5-step process:

1. Variation: Within a population, individuals have different traits and characteristics(Ref 1)(Ref 2).
2. Inheritance: Many of these traits are heritable, meaning they can be passed down from parents to offspring(Ref 1)(Ref 2).
3. Selection: Due to limited resources, not all individuals can survive and reproduce. Those with traits better suited to their environment have a higher chance of survival and reproduction(Ref 1)(Ref 3).
4. Time: Over generations, the advantageous traits become more common in the population(Ref 3).
5. Adaptation: The population becomes better adapted to its environment as beneficial traits accumulate(Ref 3).

This process can be remembered using the acronym VISTA: Variation, Inheritance, Selection, Time, and Adaptation(Ref 3).Key points to understand about natural selection:

• It's a simple mechanism that causes populations to change over time(Ref 3).
• It requires no conscious direction or intervention(Ref 4).
• It acts on existing variation within a population(Ref 1)(Ref 2).
• Beneficial traits are those that increase an organism's chances of survival and reproduction(Ref 1)(Ref 5).
• The environment plays a crucial role in determining which traits are advantageous(Ref 1)(Ref 4).

Darwin drew inspiration for this theory from artificial selection practiced by farmers and breeders(Ref 2)(Ref 4). He realized that nature could act as a selective force in a similar way, but without human intervention(Ref 4).It's important to note that Darwin developed this theory without knowledge of genetics or the mechanisms of inheritance(Ref 1). Later discoveries in genetics provided additional evidence and explanations for how traits are passed down and how new variations arise through mutations(Ref 1)(Ref 4).

References

Ref 1: https://www.livescience.com/474-controversy-evolution-works.html

Ref 2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_selection

Ref 3: https://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/darwin/evolution-today/natural-selection-vista

Ref 4: https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/natural-selection/

Ref 5: https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolution-101/mechanisms-the-processes-of-evolution/natural-selection/

Corporate Ethics and Wealth Redistribution: A Path Forward

In today's economic landscape, corporations often operate like "obligate evil robots," driven solely by the pursuit of profit. This isn't due to malice but rather the nature of the system itself. CEOs and boards are compelled to prioritize the bottom line, as failing to do so could lead to their replacement by more ruthless competitors. This dynamic creates an ethical conundrum, where financial gain is frequently placed above societal well-being.

The Corporate Dilemma

Corporate leaders face a clear and pressing ethical dilemma:

1. Pursue profit at all costs: Corporate structures are designed to maximize shareholder value, often at the expense of broader societal and environmental concerns. This approach is deeply ingrained in the corporate governance model, making ethical considerations secondary.

2. Risk being replaced by those who will: The relentless pursuit of profit isn't just a choice; it's a necessity. If CEOs or boards prioritize ethics over profit, they risk being ousted by shareholders or replaced by competitors who are willing to sacrifice ethics for higher returns. This creates a vicious cycle where short-term financial performance is prioritized over long-term sustainability and social responsibility.

Solutions Through Legislation

Rather than lamenting this entrenched system, we must work together to mitigate its negative impacts through proactive legislation. Key steps include:

1. Implementing legislation that requires corporations to be better citizens: Governments must set clear and enforceable standards for corporate behavior, compelling companies to prioritize environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors. This could include mandates for reducing carbon emissions, ensuring fair labor practices, and promoting diversity and inclusion.

2. Creating enforceable, measurable standards for corporate behavior: Legislation should be backed by rigorous oversight and transparency requirements. Corporations should be required to regularly report on their ESG performance, with penalties for non-compliance.

3. Penalizing CEOs and corporations for circumventing rules: Enforcement is critical. Penalties should be substantial enough to deter unethical behavior and include personal accountability for corporate leaders. This could involve fines, restrictions on executive compensation, and even criminal charges for egregious violations.

Wealth Redistribution in an Automated World

As we move towards a future where automation and artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly dominate production, the traditional relationship between labor and wealth creation is being disrupted. This necessitates new mechanisms for wealth redistribution to ensure economic stability and social equity. Two promising approaches are:

1. Universal Basic Income (UBI):

   • Provide a guaranteed income to all citizens: UBI ensures that every individual has a basic level of financial security, regardless of employment status. This can help buffer the economic shocks caused by automation and job displacement.
   • Start small (e.g., $100/month) and gradually increase: A phased approach allows for adjustment and evaluation, ensuring that the program is sustainable and effective.

   Benefits:

   • Eliminates costly means-testing: UBI simplifies the welfare system, reducing bureaucracy and administrative costs associated with determining eligibility for various benefits.
   • Stimulates economic demand: By providing people with a stable income, UBI encourages spending, which drives economic growth and supports local businesses.
   • Provides individual agency: With a guaranteed income, individuals have greater freedom to pursue education, start businesses, or take risks they might otherwise avoid.

2. Universal Basic Services (UBS):

   • Offer essential services like healthcare, dental care, education, and public transportation: UBS ensures that everyone has access to the necessities of life, reducing inequality and promoting social cohesion.
   • Protects against catastrophic expenses: By providing essential services, UBS reduces the financial burden on individuals, particularly in areas like healthcare, where unexpected costs can be devastating.
   • More cost-effective than privatized systems: Public provision of essential services can be more efficient and equitable than privatized alternatives, as evidenced by the disparities between public healthcare systems and the heavily privatized U.S. model.

Addressing Concerns

Critics often argue that UBI will discourage productivity, fostering a culture of dependency. However, this concern is largely unfounded:

1. Many unproductive individuals already exist in the workplace: The assumption that employment equals productivity is flawed. Many jobs, particularly in bureaucratic or redundant sectors, contribute little to overall productivity. UBI would allow individuals to engage in more meaningful and creative pursuits, potentially leading to greater innovation and societal benefit.

2. The potential economic benefits outweigh these concerns: Studies and pilot programs have shown that UBI can actually increase entrepreneurship, improve mental health, and lead to higher educational attainment, all of which contribute to a more dynamic and resilient economy.

The Path Forward

To implement these changes, we need strong political will and a commitment to long-term thinking. This requires:

1. Political will reflected by representatives: Citizens must elect leaders who prioritize the public good over corporate interests. This means supporting candidates who advocate for UBI, UBS, and corporate reform, and holding them accountable once in office. Here is a site to check out: https://Represent.Us It can give you ideas as to how to go ahead and take real action.

2. Replacement of politicians who don't serve the people's interests: If elected officials fail to act in the public's interest, they must be replaced. This can be achieved through grassroots organizing, voter education, and, where necessary, electoral reform to reduce the influence of money in politics.

Potential Benefits

The benefits of implementing these reforms are manifold:

1. Improved overall health and productivity: By ensuring that everyone has access to essential services and a basic income, society can achieve better health outcomes, reduce stress, and increase overall productivity.

2. Reduced stress on the population: Financial insecurity is a major source of stress. By addressing this through UBI and UBS, we can improve mental health and social stability.

3. More efficient use of resources: By eliminating wasteful practices, reducing inequality, and promoting sustainable business practices, we can create a more efficient and equitable economy.

Corporate Reform

Beyond wealth redistribution, we must also address the corporate practices that exacerbate inequality and environmental degradation. This includes:

1. Planned obsolescence: Corporations often design products with artificially short lifespans to drive repeat purchases, contributing to waste and environmental harm. Legislation should incentivize the production of durable, repairable goods.

2. Excessive packaging and waste: Companies should be required to minimize packaging and use sustainable materials. This would reduce waste and lower the environmental impact of consumer goods.

3. Artificial scarcity through patent abuse: Corporations often use patents to stifle competition and create artificial scarcity, particularly in essential sectors like pharmaceuticals. Reforming patent laws to prevent abuse would promote innovation and lower costs for consumers.

Conclusion

By tackling these issues head-on, we can create a more equitable and sustainable economic system for all. This requires a multifaceted approach, combining legislative reform, wealth redistribution, and corporate responsibility. Together, these measures can ensure that our economic system serves the needs of society, rather than being driven solely by the pursuit of profit. The path forward is challenging but necessary to build a future where prosperity and ethics go hand in hand.

QR Code Generator

Below you can generate a QR Code for a site URL that can be used by a smartphone camera to visit the site. 

URL QR Code Generator

Enter URL:

Below you can generate a 'vCard' that can be used by a smartphone camera to add contact information to stored contacts. 

vCard QR Code Generator

Full Name:

Company:

Job Title:

Phone Number:

Email:

Website:

Address:

We're past AGI. It's ASI now.

The Dawn of Artificial Superintelligence: Harnessing the Human-AI Symbiosis

We've reached a pivotal moment in the realm of artificial intelligence. It's becoming increasingly evident that Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) is either just around the corner or might already exist behind closed doors. The rapid advancements we're witnessing aren't just incremental—they're monumental. The fact that researchers are now focusing on ironing out AI's "common sense" failures speaks volumes about how far we've come.

The Toddler Taking Giant Leaps

Consider this: the "real" variant of ChatGPT was introduced in November 2022. Initially, it operated at a grade-school level, handling basic queries and simple tasks. Fast forward to the recent 'o1' release, and we're seeing an AI that operates at a graduate student level, outperforming human experts in certain domains. This technological "toddler" isn't even two years old yet! It's genuinely baffling that some experts still claim significant breakthroughs are years away when evidence suggests they're happening right now.

A Brain Teaser and the Evolution of AI Reasoning

To illustrate the leap in AI capabilities, I posed a problem to various AI models across multiple releases:

Alan owes Bob $2. Bob owes Cindy $2. Cindy owes Alan $2. Only Bob has any money, and it's just $1. What sequence of events will pay everyone off, and where does the $1 end up?

Early versions from 2023 struggled with this question. They often didn't grasp the problem, and even with multiple hints—sometimes effectively giving away the answer—they couldn't solve it. The highest-rated version 4.0 still stumbled, requiring several attempts and prompts before arriving at the correct solution.

Enter the Orion preview 'o1'. Not only did it nail the question on the first try, but it also provided a perfect explanation of the solution and the reasoning behind it. What's even more astonishing is that this preview is a limited version, significantly less capable than the full model set to be released in a few weeks.

Thinking Inside and Outside the Box

What's truly remarkable about the AI's solution was its ability to reason both inside and outside the box. The AI not only found the expected answer but also offered an alternative solution that was arguably better given certain parameters. This dual approach showcases AI's evolving ability to explore conventional and unconventional pathways simultaneously.

One of the significant advantages of AI in problem-solving is its capacity to process vast amounts of information rapidly, trying out numerous patterns—both novel and traditional—to arrive at a solution. While AI models may sometimes make mistakes that attract criticism, these errors often stem from a lack of specific training data rather than an inherent limitation. It's not that the AI doesn't understand the parameters; it simply wasn't aware of them, much like a human before training. The corrective process is swift and scalable.

Unleashing the Power of Massive Infrastructure

But here's something that's often overlooked: the enormous hardware infrastructure powering these AI models. These systems are concurrently serving 600 million visits per month, handling countless small tasks seamlessly. Imagine applying just a sixth of that capacity—100 million visits worth—to a single large task. The potential outcome would be something far beyond human ability.

This immense processing power isn't just theoretical—it's a super capability that's either already in use or within our immediate reach. The ability to allocate such vast resources to complex problems means AI can tackle challenges at scales and speeds previously unimaginable.

The Symbiotic Relationship: Enhancing and Scaling AI

This brings us to an exciting frontier: leveraging the Human-AI symbiosis to achieve feats beyond the capability of either alone. Let's itemize the factors that enhance and scale AI:

1. Enormous Hardware Infrastructure: The AI operates on vast computational resources, enabling it to process and analyze data at incredible speeds.

2. Concurrent Processing: Serving millions of users simultaneously allows the AI to learn and adapt from a wide array of interactions.

3. Scalability: The ability to allocate massive computational power to single tasks means tackling complex problems efficiently.

4. Algorithmic Advancement: We have yet to fully explore the "killer strategy" of computer science—the algorithm. Optimizing algorithms will exponentially amplify AI capabilities.

5. Human-AI Collaboration: Humans provide context, creativity, and ethical considerations, guiding AI to more meaningful outcomes.

A Superintelligence in the Making

Given these enhancements, it's puzzling that the existing systems aren't already considered to be beyond any foreseeable "general intelligence." If an AI can self-improve by reviewing and redoing aspects of a problem, self-checking to yield better answers, and can process tasks at such a massive scale, isn't that indicative of a form of superintelligence?

The term Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is often used, but it's a vague and poorly defined measure. Perhaps it's time to develop better metrics to assess the types of superintelligence we're creating and how we can enhance them. If an AI system is indistinguishable from a human in its capabilities and interactions, for all practical purposes, it functions as a form of general intelligence. The distinction becomes less about definitions and more about application and impact.

The AI Arms Race: A Winner-Takes-All Scenario

With the technology we have now, we can build highly capable AI agents that are more knowledgeable than any human and smarter than most by a significant margin. These agents can accelerate AI development exponentially. Once an AI system can autonomously navigate problem spaces, it can surpass human capabilities rapidly.

Companies like Google, OpenAI, Meta, and Microsoft likely possess the resources and technology to develop a superintelligent AI system that's qualitatively different from anything we've seen before. The stakes are enormous, and the race has become a "winner-takes-all" scenario, fueling an incredible drive to advance.

Embracing the Future: Leveraging the Human-AI Symbiote

So, how do we leverage the Human-AI symbiote to achieve extraordinary outcomes? By embracing collaboration, we can:

• Enhance Creativity: Combining human intuition with AI's data-driven insights can lead to innovative solutions.

• Accelerate Innovation: AI can process and analyze information at unprecedented speeds, helping humans make breakthroughs faster.

• Improve Decision-Making: AI's ability to simulate and predict outcomes can aid humans in making more informed choices.

• Scale Problem-Solving: By harnessing the massive infrastructure behind AI, we can tackle global challenges with a level of coordination and efficiency previously unattainable.

The Philosophical Perspective

Moreover, if a counterfeit is indistinguishable from the real thing, for all practical purposes, it is the real thing. This philosophical notion challenges us to reconsider our definitions of intelligence and consciousness in the context of AI.

The Exponential Growth and the Algorithmic Advantage

We haven't even fully tapped into the potential of optimized algorithms. As AI continues to evolve, refining algorithms will play a crucial role in amplifying its capabilities. Coupled with AI's ability to self-improve and learn from vast datasets, the potential for rapid advancement is staggering.

Consider this: AI systems are simultaneously serving thousands, if not millions, of users, continuously learning and refining their responses. This collective processing power and iterative improvement cycle place current AI systems well beyond any traditional measure of 'general intelligence'.

The Road Ahead: A New Era of Possibilities

The future isn't just about AI or humans independently—it's about how we can work together to unlock new possibilities. By combining the vast computational power and scalability of AI with human creativity and ethical guidance, we can tackle challenges on a global scale.

---

"...co-founder Sergey Brin is back at Google—and working on AI 'pretty much every day.'"
Entrepreneur: Sergey Brin Is Back—Is Google Working on a 'God' AI Model?

---

In Conclusion

The age of superintelligent AI isn't just approaching—it's here. We're witnessing the emergence of systems that can reason, learn, and even exhibit creativity in ways that were once the domain of science fiction. By acknowledging and leveraging the immense infrastructure and capabilities at our disposal, and by embracing the symbiotic relationship between humans and AI, we can navigate this new landscape to achieve feats previously thought impossible.

What are your thoughts? Let's embark on this journey together and explore the incredible potential that lies ahead!