Skip to main content

Knee-Jerk Gun Control Legislation

Many people insist on gun control legislation any time there is a shooting. It is politically hard to sell and as a life-saving measure it is a waste of time and resources. Time, resources, political capital and energy spent on a fruitless effort to control a significant minority of the population could instead be productively used to actually save lives. 

When we get news of a random mass shooting, it is as good a time as any to oppose senseless death. It is not such a good time to make rules for hundreds of millions of people. Maybe things should change, but not by angry actions in the heat of the moment. This is not the time to design public policy.

More than five thousand people die in the United States every day. If you save just one percent of those people, you save the lives of fifty people. You save not just fifty people today, but fifty people every single day -- more than ten thousand people a year. 

We already know things that will both save lives and make life better. Those things are supported by sensible evidence. 

Consider this: "Historically, every other developed nation has achieved universal health care through some form of nonprofit national health insurance. Our failure to do so means that all Americans pay higher health care costs, and 45,000 [annually] pay with their lives." -- Steffie Woolhandler, MD, MPH, staff physician and Associate Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School (HMS).

If you fight to get absolute no-brainer fixes like Universal Health Care you will save lives.

When it comes right down to it, it seems that people don't really want to help. It is every man for himself. They can help, but in practice they just won't.

The Second Amendment allows the people at the bottom to be armed against despotic oppression from the top. Gun control would be fine if done at a local level such that people could gain back control of their government if needed.


It is weird how invasive and tyrannical the U.S. Federal government has become. I think it would be a very bad idea to disarm while central government continues to expand its control. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The system cannot execute the specified program

It always annoys me no end when I get messages like the following: "The system cannot execute the specified program." I got the above error from Windows XP when I tried to execute a program I use all the time. The message is hugely aggravating because it says the obvious without giving any actionable information. If you have such a problem and you are executing from a deep directory structure that may be your problem. It was in my case. Looking on the web with that phrase brought up a bunch of arcane stuff that did not apply to me. It mostly brought up long threads (as these things tend to do) which follow this pattern: 'Q' is the guy with the problem asking for help 'A' can be any number of people who jump in to 'help'. Q: I got this error "The system cannot execute the specified program." when I tried to ... [long list of things tried] A: What program were you running, what operating system, where is the program? What type of

The JWST did not take resources away from the poor.

The JWST project employed many people for a long time. It helped them and their communities. Like other NASA projects, it has funded technology breakthroughs that will pay back the investment. Right now, mathematical physicists are working on a new theory that combines quantum physics and relativity and explains how the two emerge from a common root structure. This will be aided by knowledge of the early universe we get from JWST. A breakthrough there could lead to essentially limitless low-cost energy. It could possibly lead to crazy stuff like anti-gravity and magnetic monopoles. It could extend the periodic table, and allow us to create exotic substances, it could allow us to create room temperature superconductors, and it could conceivably allow us to figure out how to explore the galaxy. Our understanding of electromagnetism since the 19th century has allowed us to do miraculous things that people in earlier centuries would simply think of as pure magic. Reaching for the stars is

Coming Soon: General Artificial Intelligence

The closer you get to experts who understand the nuts and bolts and history of AI, the more you find them saying that what we have is not nearly General Artificial Intelligence (GAI), and that GAI seems far away. I think we already have the roots in place with Neural Networks (NN), Deep Learning (DL), Machine Learning (ML), and primitive domain limited Artificial Intelligence (AI). Things like computer vision, voice recognition, and language translation are already in production. These are tough problems, but in some ways, machines are already better than humans are. I expect GAI to be an emergent property as systems mature, join, and augment one another. I was around during the 70s AI winter, and was involved in the 80s AI winter as one of the naysayers. I built a demonstration system with a Sperry voice recognition card in 1984. I could demonstrate it in a quiet room, but as a practical matter, it was not production ready at all. Around 1988 we built demonstration expert systems usin