Skip to main content

What happens when we replace jobs with automation

Depending on how we control the roll-out of new systems everybody will live incredibly interesting, healthy, happy lives of adventure and leisure, or scary lives of misery. We should be working on the restructuring of things, so we avoid the latter scenario. 

Others have been skeptical that we will replace most jobs. I am sure we will replace them, and I think it will happen faster than most of us are prepared to deal with.

One of my rules of thumb is that ‘things that are different are not the same’. You must be wary of conflation and false analogies/equivalencies. 

People are looking at the current progress with AI/ML/DL and automation as if this is not something poised to go into a positive feedback loop and change exponentially. This is something whose nature is different than things we have seen before. 

As someone who has watched this unfold for half a century, I am amazed at the progress we have made. The prior stabs at AI that led to AI winters were different than what is happening now. Back then, those systems did not work. Today’s systems work. It is almost spooky the way that cameras can now recognize and categorize images. I did one of the first voice recognition things in Toronto back in the early 1980s. In a carefully controlled demo, I could get my program to recognize enough speech to navigate a menu, but only if we kept the room dead quiet. Voice recognition is now astonishingly good. It is an entirely different thing. For many things like games, and image recognition, modern systems already exceed the abilities of human beings. 

Over the next couple of decades, automation will replace most jobs. We see it happening all around now. When we first introduced ATMs in the 1980s, there was a lot of resistance to using them. Now, if you are just going to get cash, you go to an ATM. For most other things, I do them from my phone. It is still weird to me that you can deposit a check by phone. 

People do not seem to have noticed much, but we have already replaced all kinds of jobs. Self-checkouts now outnumber cashiers at a couple of our stores. Well paid factory work has given way increasingly to poorly paid service jobs and we are systematically replacing those. 

Lots of people drive for a living and easily half of those jobs will be gone. It may even happen before the decade is out. 

We are already at the point where we need a Universal Basic Income (UBI). People do not need ‘jobs. They need an income. It is time we saw necessary evils (like laborious jobs) for the evil they are and made them unnecessary. We should not make people dependent upon doing things they do not want to do because they need an income. We have enough wealth; we just have not distributed it well. UBI is the way to fix that.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The system cannot execute the specified program

It always annoys me no end when I get messages like the following: "The system cannot execute the specified program." I got the above error from Windows XP when I tried to execute a program I use all the time. The message is hugely aggravating because it says the obvious without giving any actionable information. If you have such a problem and you are executing from a deep directory structure that may be your problem. It was in my case. Looking on the web with that phrase brought up a bunch of arcane stuff that did not apply to me. It mostly brought up long threads (as these things tend to do) which follow this pattern: 'Q' is the guy with the problem asking for help 'A' can be any number of people who jump in to 'help'. Q: I got this error "The system cannot execute the specified program." when I tried to ... [long list of things tried] A: What program were you running, what operating system, where is the program? What type of

The JWST did not take resources away from the poor.

The JWST project employed many people for a long time. It helped them and their communities. Like other NASA projects, it has funded technology breakthroughs that will pay back the investment. Right now, mathematical physicists are working on a new theory that combines quantum physics and relativity and explains how the two emerge from a common root structure. This will be aided by knowledge of the early universe we get from JWST. A breakthrough there could lead to essentially limitless low-cost energy. It could possibly lead to crazy stuff like anti-gravity and magnetic monopoles. It could extend the periodic table, and allow us to create exotic substances, it could allow us to create room temperature superconductors, and it could conceivably allow us to figure out how to explore the galaxy. Our understanding of electromagnetism since the 19th century has allowed us to do miraculous things that people in earlier centuries would simply think of as pure magic. Reaching for the stars is

Coming Soon: General Artificial Intelligence

The closer you get to experts who understand the nuts and bolts and history of AI, the more you find them saying that what we have is not nearly General Artificial Intelligence (GAI), and that GAI seems far away. I think we already have the roots in place with Neural Networks (NN), Deep Learning (DL), Machine Learning (ML), and primitive domain limited Artificial Intelligence (AI). Things like computer vision, voice recognition, and language translation are already in production. These are tough problems, but in some ways, machines are already better than humans are. I expect GAI to be an emergent property as systems mature, join, and augment one another. I was around during the 70s AI winter, and was involved in the 80s AI winter as one of the naysayers. I built a demonstration system with a Sperry voice recognition card in 1984. I could demonstrate it in a quiet room, but as a practical matter, it was not production ready at all. Around 1988 we built demonstration expert systems usin