Skip to main content

Are AI writing tools worse than useless?

AI writing tools will eventually be necessary and ultimately replace human authors. However, as of this writing (2022-11-19) they:

1) Offer little to no utility for those who write well (though see below).

2) Are likely of negative utility to those who do not write well. 

The caveat for (1) above is that in some instances it may be useful to identify where text is poor enough to be misinterpreted. 

necessary for people who write well

My original extemporaneous text (Reading level 5.4): 

I am considering the use of Word tune over Grammarly. My experience with these things has been generally good but spotty. For text I want to be well received I would like to get the benefit of all of the tools.

After proofing in Microsoft Word (Reading level 5.4):

I am considering the use of Word tune over Grammarly. My experience with these things has been good but spotty. To get the best text I would like to get the benefit of all the available tools.

Wordtune rewrites (Average reading level (5.9)

The use of Word tune over Grammarly has generally been good, but spotty. For text, I would like to get the benefit of all of the tools. 

My experience with these things has been generally good but spotty. I would like to be well received for text so I would like to utilize all the tools available. 

I'm considering Word tune over Grammarly. My experience with these tools is generally good but spotty. I'd like to get the full benefit of all tools for text. 

Generally, I have had good success with these tools, but my experience has been spotty. For text I want to be well - received, so I would like to have the best of both tools. 

With my experience, Word tune is generally good, but spotty. For text, I want to be well received, and I want to make use of all the tools. 

WordTune is an option I am considering over Grammarly. Overall, my experiences with these tools have been good but spotty. For text, I would like to find out how well received it will be. 

It may be a better option to use Word tune over Grammarly. I have used these tools generally well, but occasionally have been disappointed. For text, I would like to get the full benefit of all the tools. 

For texts I want to be well received I would like to have all the tools available to me. My experience with these things has been generally good but not consistent. 

With Word Tune and Grammarly, I am considering using it more for text. My experience so far has generally been good, but spotty. I want to make sure my text is well received. 

For text, I would like the benefit of all of the tools available, so I am considering Word tune over Grammarly. My experience with any of these tools has been generally good but spotty.  



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The system cannot execute the specified program

It always annoys me no end when I get messages like the following: "The system cannot execute the specified program." I got the above error from Windows XP when I tried to execute a program I use all the time. The message is hugely aggravating because it says the obvious without giving any actionable information. If you have such a problem and you are executing from a deep directory structure that may be your problem. It was in my case. Looking on the web with that phrase brought up a bunch of arcane stuff that did not apply to me. It mostly brought up long threads (as these things tend to do) which follow this pattern: 'Q' is the guy with the problem asking for help 'A' can be any number of people who jump in to 'help'. Q: I got this error "The system cannot execute the specified program." when I tried to ... [long list of things tried] A: What program were you running, what operating system, where is the program? What type of

The JWST did not take resources away from the poor.

The JWST project employed many people for a long time. It helped them and their communities. Like other NASA projects, it has funded technology breakthroughs that will pay back the investment. Right now, mathematical physicists are working on a new theory that combines quantum physics and relativity and explains how the two emerge from a common root structure. This will be aided by knowledge of the early universe we get from JWST. A breakthrough there could lead to essentially limitless low-cost energy. It could possibly lead to crazy stuff like anti-gravity and magnetic monopoles. It could extend the periodic table, and allow us to create exotic substances, it could allow us to create room temperature superconductors, and it could conceivably allow us to figure out how to explore the galaxy. Our understanding of electromagnetism since the 19th century has allowed us to do miraculous things that people in earlier centuries would simply think of as pure magic. Reaching for the stars is

Coming Soon: General Artificial Intelligence

The closer you get to experts who understand the nuts and bolts and history of AI, the more you find them saying that what we have is not nearly General Artificial Intelligence (GAI), and that GAI seems far away. I think we already have the roots in place with Neural Networks (NN), Deep Learning (DL), Machine Learning (ML), and primitive domain limited Artificial Intelligence (AI). Things like computer vision, voice recognition, and language translation are already in production. These are tough problems, but in some ways, machines are already better than humans are. I expect GAI to be an emergent property as systems mature, join, and augment one another. I was around during the 70s AI winter, and was involved in the 80s AI winter as one of the naysayers. I built a demonstration system with a Sperry voice recognition card in 1984. I could demonstrate it in a quiet room, but as a practical matter, it was not production ready at all. Around 1988 we built demonstration expert systems usin